Case 2305702/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Pear Marketing Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305702/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 11 March 2022, Employment Judge Webster proceeded under Rule 21 in the Respondent's absence. The tribunal upheld the Claimant's claims for unpaid notice pay, unpaid holiday pay and unpaid Statutory Sick Pay against Pear Marketing Ltd.
The judgment ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant a total of £839.72 gross. The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision record. The award was recorded as a single gross figure and was not apportioned between the individual heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid notice pay was upheld in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay was upheld in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid Statutory Sick Pay was upheld in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £840
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.