Case 2305710/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Charles Boadu v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305710/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms Elsie Coke, Mr David Newlyn
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Charles Boadu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant was not in attendance and was not represented at the hearing. The Tribunal considered the information available to it.
The Tribunal dismissed the claims in exercise of its power under rule 47. No written reasons were provided in the judgment record, which states that oral reasons had been given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claims under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. It does not set out the substantive allegations; classification reflects the listed claim category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claims under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. It does not set out the substantive allegations; classification reflects the listed claim category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.