Case 2305974/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Poundland Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305974/2021
- Decision date
- 11 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Preliminary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Andrews, the claimant withdrew her pregnancy discrimination claim. The Tribunal dismissed that claim upon withdrawal.
The remaining unpaid wages/holiday pay claim was not determined on its merits in the text provided. The judgment stated that it would be dismissed automatically 14 days after the judgment unless the claimant notified the Tribunal that the respondent had failed to pay her £371 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The claim of pregnancy discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unpaid wages/holiday pay claim was to be dismissed automatically 14 days after the judgment unless the claimant notified the Tribunal that the respondent had failed to pay £371 gross. The judgment did not split the sum between wages and holiday pay. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The unpaid wages/holiday pay claim was to be dismissed automatically 14 days after the judgment unless the claimant notified the Tribunal that the respondent had failed to pay £371 gross. The judgment did not split the sum between wages and holiday pay. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £371
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.