Case 2305993/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Smith v Metropolis International Group Limited«resp_others» — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305993/2021
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Cawthray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 9 June 2023, Employment Judge G Cawthray issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal dismissed Miss A Smith’s complaints of victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010 and harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010 after the claimant withdrew those claims.
The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining complaints were not determined at that stage and were listed to proceed to a hearing commencing on 24 June 2024. Those remaining complaints were constructive unfair dismissal, automatically constructive unfair dismissal under section 103A, PID detriment, direct race discrimination, direct sex discrimination, harassment related to race and sex, failure to make reasonable adjustments, breach of contract, and equal pay on like work.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; section 27 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.