Case 2306115/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Lacey v Southern Housing — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306115/2024
- Decision date
- 11 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Lacey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss L Lacey's whistleblowing claim against Southern Housing. It did so pursuant to the strike out warning dated 5 December 2024 after the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's orders of 14 August 2024 and 11 September 2024 requiring further details of the whistleblowing claim.
The reasons recorded that the claim had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had failed to make representations in writing, or had not made sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be ordered or requesting a hearing. The tribunal therefore ordered that the claim be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Struck out pursuant to the strike out warning dated 5 December 2024 because the claimant did not comply with orders dated 14 August 2024 and 11 September 2024 to provide further details of the whistleblowing claim, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.