Case 2306338/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Hale v Herne Bay Infant School, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306338/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
3 namedClaimant
M Hale
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 16 July 2025 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the sex discrimination classification comes from the listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the unlawful deduction classification comes from the listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the working time classification comes from the listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.