Case 2306348/2020 · Employment Tribunal
S Partridge v Capel-Le-Ferne Primary School Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306348/2020
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Partridge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 June 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Andrews struck out the claim. The order was approved on 2 September 2025. The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability and records no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment itself does not list individual causes of action; the claim type is taken from the case listing supplied in Layer 1. The order recorded here is that the claim was struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment itself does not list individual causes of action; the claim type is taken from the case listing supplied in Layer 1. The order recorded here is that the claim was struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself does not list individual causes of action; the claim type is taken from the case listing supplied in Layer 1. The order recorded here is that the claim was struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment itself does not list individual causes of action; the claim type is taken from the case listing supplied in Layer 1. The order recorded here is that the claim was struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.