Case 2306423/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Karim v London Borough of Southwark and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306423/2023
- Decision date
- 13 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macey
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr Harrington-Roberts, Ms Leverton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Karim
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of direct discrimination on the grounds of disability against the London Borough of Southwark and Ms M Williams-Pinnock. The tribunal identified the claim as a complaint under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint, finding it was not well-founded. The written judgment states that the respondents did not contravene section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only that the complaint of direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.