Case 2306641/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Khalilov v Sinomax International Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306641/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray Judgment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Khalilov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 April 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr S Khalilov an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's Orders/Directions and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not set out any determination of the underlying substantive dispute, and it records no monetary award or separate remedy assessment. The decision was made by Employment Judge Cawthray on 12 November 2024 and sent to the parties on 15 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make adequate representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 19 April 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.