Case 2306773/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Stone v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306773/2023
- Decision date
- 21 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Stone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name by consent to G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited. The claimant's application to amend his claim to include a claim of direct race discrimination was refused.
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claim within that time limit, and the unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant's application to amend his claim to include direct race discrimination was refused; the substantive race discrimination claim was not adjudicated. | Other | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.