Case 2307007/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Twyman v Herne Church Of England Infant School and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2307007/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
3 namedClaimant
M Twyman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 15 April 2025 asking whether, in light of the outcome of the Harpur Trust litigation, they wished to pursue or withdraw the claim. The letter was returned because the claimant was no longer at that address.
The claimant had not provided an alternate correspondence address. The Tribunal concluded that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Part Time Workers; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out the pleaded legal basis in detail. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out the pleaded legal basis in detail. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Working Time Regulations; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and refers to the outcome of the Harpur Trust litigation. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.