Case 2307057/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Masip Ribes v Rico Sabor Dover Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2307057/2023
- Decision date
- 12 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Masip Ribes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 June 2024, the tribunal gave Miss R Masip Ribes an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge McLaren struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying employment dispute, nor does it record any compensation or other remedy. It is a procedural strike-out decision only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's strike-out warning. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included because the case listing identified unlawful deduction from wages as a claim category, but the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not separate outcomes by head of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.