Case 2307058/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Petrachi Birzoi v Al-Khair Foundation Mr S Yusaf Mr A Hossain — 2026
- Case reference
- 2307058/2023
- Decision date
- 9 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
- Panel members
- Ms R Effrey, Ms M Foster Norman
Parties
2 namedMrs A Petrachi Birzoi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous Tribunal held that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded, together with claims of unlawful indirect sex discrimination and harassment under the Equality Act 2010. The claimant's claims for holiday pay and notice pay were also successful.
The respondents (Al-Khair Foundation, Mr S Yusaf and Mr A Hossain) were ordered to pay the claimant compensation of £24,736, comprising a basic award for unfair dismissal of £2,520 plus a 25% uplift, £500 loss of statutory rights, £18,090 compensation for unlawful discrimination inclusive of interest, notice pay of £2,730 and holiday pay of £266. The recoupment provisions did not apply.
Reasons were given orally and written reasons were not provided in the published document.
Claims and outcomes
10 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £2,730 |
| Constructive dismissal | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £2,730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,736
- Basic award
- £2,520
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.