Case 2307103/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Kevin Jourdia v On Dot Media Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2307103/2023
- Decision date
- 14 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hamour
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kevin Jourdia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld the claimant's claim of sexual harassment and ordered the respondent to pay an injury to feelings award of GBP 7,500.
The Tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for holiday pay and ordered payment of GBP 6,310.32, subject to required PAYE deductions. The claimant's discrimination claims on grounds of disability, race and sexual orientation failed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment describes this as a claim of sexual harassment and awards injury to feelings, but does not specify a protected characteristic for this claim. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
| Holiday pay | The award is stated to be subject to such PAYE deductions as the respondent is required to make. | Upheld | — | £6,310 |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,810
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.