Case 2307263/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Asda Stores Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307263/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend a preliminary hearing on 11 January 2022 despite being notified of it. Orders sent on 13 January 2022 required him to confirm by 4pm on 25 January 2022 whether he wished to continue with or withdraw his claim, and warned that a failure to respond could lead the Tribunal to consider striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not write to the Tribunal as ordered. The Tribunal found that he was not actively pursuing his claim and struck it out. The hearing listed to commence on 20 June 2022 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as not actively pursued. The judgment text does not separately particularise the unfair dismissal claim; classification follows the listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim as not actively pursued. The judgment text does not separately particularise the disability discrimination claim; classification follows the listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.