Case 2307470/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v London Borough of Sutton — 2025
- Case reference
- 2307470/2023
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Claimant’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 15 April 2025 before Employment Judge Martin, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by Mr T Lester, Counsel. The judgment records that the Claimant brought claims for discrimination arising from disability and for reasonable adjustments against the London Borough of Sutton.
The Tribunal struck out both claims. It held that the discrimination arising from disability claim had no reasonable prospect of success, and it reached the same conclusion in respect of the reasonable adjustments claim. No remedy was awarded because both claims were struck out at that stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising from disability was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for reasonable adjustments was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.