Case 2307471/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jan Nordman v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2307471/2023
- Decision date
- 30 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jan Nordman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim comprised complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract. The tribunal recorded that these complaints can only be brought once employment has ended or after notice has been given on either side.
After a letter dated 26 March 2024, the claimant requested a hearing and provided representations. Those representations confirmed that he was still employed by the respondent. The tribunal found there was no prospect of it having jurisdiction, that a hearing would not change matters, and that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. The claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant's representations confirmed he was still employed by the respondent, so the tribunal found there was no prospect of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the breach of contract complaint because the claimant's representations confirmed he was still employed by the respondent, so the tribunal found there was no prospect of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.