Case 2307635/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Linford, Counsel For the v P, in person — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307635/2020
- Decision date
- 18 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Date
- Panel members
- Mrs C Chaudhari, Ms E Thompson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Linford, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAll of the claims were brought within the applicable three-month time limit, so the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim under s98 Employment Rights Act 1996, the direct sex discrimination claim under s13 Equality Act 2010, the harassment claim under s26 Equality Act, and the unpaid holiday pay claim. It held that the claims succeeded overall.
The tribunal nevertheless found that the claimant's dismissal was not itself an act of direct discrimination or harassment. It upheld the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the dismissal was procedurally unfair, but recorded that the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment and had suffered no financial loss from the dismissal.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded £300 for loss of statutory rights in the unfair dismissal claim, £30,000 for injury to feelings in the Equality Act claims, including £5,000 for aggravated damages, interest on the injury to feelings award from 17 March 2019 to 17 March 2022 at 3% per annum amounting to £2,702.47, and £341.10 for accrued holiday pay. The total award was £33,343.57 payable immediately, and the tribunal also made a recommendation under s124(3) Equality Act that the second respondent remove any images of the claimant from his phone or other storage medium.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally unfair but made no separate award of compensation for financial loss because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment and suffered no financial loss. The £300 award was for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Sex discrimination | The direct sex discrimination claim succeeded, but the tribunal said the dismissal itself was not an act of direct discrimination. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The harassment claim related to sex and sexual harassment succeeded, but the tribunal said the dismissal itself was not an act of harassment. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £341 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £33,344
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £300
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s26 Equality Act
- s124(3) Equality Act
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.