Case 2307667/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Adefunke Adekoya and others v Heathrow Express Operating Company Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307667/2020
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Apted Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Adefunke Adekoya and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard an open preliminary hearing on whether it had jurisdiction to determine the claimants' breach of contract claims and whether they had a contractual right to privilege travel after redundancy. The claimants were employees of Heathrow Express Operating Company Limited who had been made redundant on 30 June 2020. The judge found that the ATOC terms and conditions governing privilege travel were incorporated into their contracts when they were employed, including a right for staff with five years' service to retain the benefit on retirement or redundancy.
The tribunal then found that the contractual position changed in May 2019, when the Rail Delivery Group drew a distinction between safeguarded and non-safeguarded staff. On the tribunal's findings, only safeguarded staff who retired or were made redundant remained entitled to the travel discount after that change. The judge accepted the respondent's position that the contract could be varied, and found that the claimants' contracts were varied so that non-safeguarded employees no longer had the pleaded contractual right to privilege travel on redundancy.
Because the tribunal found that the claimants no longer had that contractual right at the date of termination, it held that no claim arose or was outstanding on termination for the purposes of the Employment Tribunals and Employment Tribunals England and Wales (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994. The tribunal therefore concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims and dismissed them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimants originally had a contractual right to privilege travel, but that the contracts were later varied so that, on redundancy, non-safeguarded staff no longer retained the benefit. As the alleged claim did not arise on termination, the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction under the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals and Employment Tribunals England and Wales (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994, article 3(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.