Case 2307989/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Allen v British Transport Police — 2024
- Case reference
- 2307989/2023
- Decision date
- 21 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 May 2024, the tribunal told Mr A Allen that it appeared he was not actively pursuing his claim and required him to write by 31 May 2024 confirming whether he still wished to proceed. The tribunal also said that, if he continued, he had to comply with the orders made on 19 April 2024. Mr Allen did not respond.
On 13 June 2024, Employment Judge Sudra directed that if the claimant did not respond to the 16 May 2024 letter within seven days the claim was likely to be struck out. There was again no response. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim because Mr Allen had not complied with the order dated 19 April 2024 and had not actively pursued the proceedings.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 26 and 27 June 2024 would not take place. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment itself does not restate the substantive jurisdiction, but the case was listed by GOV.UK as unfair dismissal; the tribunal recorded that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.