Case 2308856/2020 · Employment Tribunal
J Cook v St Nicholas' School, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2308856/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
3 namedClaimant
J Cook
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant had been given an opportunity, by letter dated 23 June 2025, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Equal Pay Act; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out separate heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Part Time Workers; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out separate heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Sex Discrimination; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out separate heads of claim. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out separate heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Working Time Regulations; the judgment itself states only that the claim is struck out and does not set out separate heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.