Case 2308924/2020 · Employment Tribunal
V Jenning v Fleetdown Primary School, and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2308924/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
3 namedClaimant
V Jenning
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by a letter dated 2 June 2025, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as Part Time Workers, Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as Part Time Workers, Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as Part Time Workers, Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.