Case 2309466/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Ahmed v National Westminster Bank plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2309466/2020
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the tribunal gave the claimant permission to amend his claim to include direct sex discrimination claims, subject to consideration of time limits. The tribunal found those claims had been presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so they were dismissed.
The claimant withdrew his race discrimination claim and his breach of contract/notice pay/wrongful dismissal claim during the hearing, and those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The unfair dismissal claim, the direct disability discrimination claim concerning dismissal, and the discrimination arising from disability claim concerning dismissal were not finally determined and were ordered to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The claimant was permitted to amend to add direct sex discrimination claims, but they were presented out of time and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant during the hearing. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as breach of contract/notice pay/wrongful dismissal and records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant during the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | This claim was not finally determined in this judgment; it was ordered to proceed to the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The direct disability discrimination claim concerning dismissal was not finally determined in this judgment; it was ordered to proceed to the final hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The discrimination arising from disability claim concerning dismissal was not finally determined in this judgment; it was ordered to proceed to the final hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.