Case 2400062/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O M Ajayi v Profile Security Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400062/2022
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O M Ajayi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing in Manchester on 23 August 2022, Employment Judge Rice-Birchall, sitting alone, dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim and stated that he was fairly dismissed by the respondent. The claimant’s redundancy payment claim also failed and was dismissed, as did his wrongful dismissal claim.
The final pay-related complaint was also unsuccessful. The tribunal recorded a claim framed as unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract concerning outstanding payments on termination; that aspect was dismissed. The arrears-of-pay element was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the outset of the hearing. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was fairly dismissed by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment grouped this with the unlawful deductions complaint; the aspect concerning outstanding payments on termination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears-of-pay aspect was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the outset of the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.