Case 2400152/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Weetman v Dunelm (soft furnishings) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2400152/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Weetman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J Weetman’s unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 28 January 2019, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the complaint should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, it concluded that the unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out.
The judgment states that the claimant’s remaining claims were still listed for preliminary hearing on 17 April 2019. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because it had no reasonable prospect of success after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning letter dated 28 January 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.