Case 2400167/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R D Haries v Postworth Ltd T/a Sky Blue (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400167/2019
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R D Haries
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese reasons concern case management rather than the merits. The case had been stayed since presentation in 2018 because the first respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and the stay could not be lifted without permission from the High Court. The claimant responded to a strike out warning by letter dated 1 January 2024, but did not seek a hearing.
After considering those representations, the tribunal sent a further letter dated 30 January 2024 giving the claimant a final opportunity to pursue the case by applying to the High Court for permission to do so. He was told that if he had not done so by the end of April 2024 the claim might be struck out. The claimant did not make that application, and the tribunal found that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claim was therefore struck out against both respondents and brought to an end. The judgment records no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim in the text; it records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to apply to the High Court for permission to continue while the first respondent was in compulsory liquidation. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.