Case 2400534/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Fernandes v Pure Technology Systems Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400534/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Fernandes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr D Fernandes's complaint under section 180 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, based on the respondent's failure to comply with section 188, was well founded. The respondent was Pure Technology Systems Ltd (in administration). The judgment records that Mr Fernandes had been dismissed for redundancy on 2 November 2021.
By way of remedy, the tribunal made a protective award ordering the respondent to pay remuneration for the period of 90 days beginning 2 November 2021. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations apply.
The annex to the judgment sets out the usual recoupment provisions, including the respondent's obligation to provide information to the Secretary of State about the employees covered by the protective award and the operation of any Recoupment Notice. No separate monetary total is stated in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 180 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188. Tribunal made a protective award of remuneration for the 90-day protected period beginning 2 November 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.