Case 2400726/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Respondent v Heard at — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400726/2024
- Decision date
- 15 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hill On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Respondent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Manchester (CVP) before Employment Judge Hill on 5 and 6 June 2024, considered claims brought by Mr K Moore against Parcel Power Logistics Limited. The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent was represented by Mr B Hendley (Consultant).
The Claimant's claim for automatic unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. The claim for wrongful dismissal was well founded, with the Respondent ordered to pay £450.90 equivalent to one week's notice pay. The breach of contract claim relating to a failure to make pension payments was also well founded, with £321.87 awarded. The Respondent was further ordered to pay £901.80, equivalent to two weeks' pay, in respect of the failure to provide a main statement of terms and conditions. The Claimant's claim for accrued outstanding holiday pay was conceded by the Respondent and £1,503.00 was agreed.
The Respondent was ordered to pay a total of £3,177.57 in compensation to the Claimant. Written reasons were not provided as the judgment was given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim for automatic unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Well founded; award equivalent to one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £451 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract by failing to make pension payments; well founded. | Upheld | — | £322 |
| Other | Failure to provide a main statement of terms and conditions; award equivalent to two weeks' pay. No discrete §4.4 enum value; mapped to 'other'. | Upheld | — | £902 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued outstanding holiday pay; conceded by the Respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,503 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,178
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.