Case 2400896/2022 · Employment Tribunal

H Sargazi v Liverpool John Moores University Higher Education Corporation — 2022

Case reference: 2400896/2022
Decision date: 26 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge M Rawlinson Appearances

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

H Sargazi

Respondent

Liverpool John Moores University Higher Education Corporation

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the public CVP hearing on 20 September 2022, the respondent applied to strike out the claimant's claims. Employment Judge M Rawlinson dismissed that application because the tribunal was not satisfied that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success.

The respondent also applied for deposit orders. That application was dismissed for the same reason, the tribunal not being satisfied that the claims had little reasonable prospect of success. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of any claim. It dismissed the respondent's applications to strike out the claimant's claims and for deposit orders, being not satisfied that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success or little reasonable prospect of success.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the .

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.