Case 2401013/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Harrison v First Signs Limited and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401013/2024
- Decision date
- 3 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Harrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It found that the complaint of unpaid holiday pay was well founded and succeeded, and ordered the second respondent, Benoticed Signs Limited, to pay the claimant £2,188.20 gross.
The claimant withdrew the remaining claims under Tribunal Procedure Rule 51. The tribunal therefore dismissed those remaining claims under Tribunal Procedure Rule 52. The judgment does not identify the withdrawn claims in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaint of unpaid holiday pay is well founded and succeeds against the second respondent. | Upheld | — | £2,188 |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant withdrew the remaining claims under Rule 51 and that they were dismissed under Rule 52, but it does not identify those claims in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,188
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules Rule 21
- Tribunal Procedure Rule 51
- Tribunal Procedure Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.