Case 2401028/2024 · Employment Tribunal
S Gregory v Complete Review Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401028/2024
- Decision date
- 13 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Gregory
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 default judgment determined on the papers after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge M Butler held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, dismissed her by reason of redundancy without paying a redundancy payment, and failed to pay accrued but untaken leave on termination.
The tribunal awarded £4,002.51 in unauthorised deductions, a redundancy payment of £961.54, and £192.30 for holiday pay, producing a total award of £5,156.35. The judgment notes that the claimant is responsible for any tax liabilities arising on the gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions: unpaid wages Dec 2023-Jan 2024 (£2,083.33) and underpayment Jun-Dec 2023 (£1,919.18). | Upheld | — | £4,003 |
| Redundancy | 1 week's pay x 2 years (between ages 22-41). | Upheld | — | £962 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,156
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.