Mr Z Romvari v Asda Stores Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2401032/2021
Decision date: 19 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Z Romvari

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Following a preliminary hearing on 16 June 2021, which the claimant did not attend, the Tribunal sent an order on 19 June 2021 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.

The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states only that "the claim" is struck out for not being actively pursued; it does not identify the cause of action in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.