Case 2401134/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Moore v The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401134/2024
- Decision date
- 6 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Moore
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 23 December 2024 before Employment Judge KM Ross. Mr G Moore did not attend and was not represented at the hearing, and neither he nor his representative gave the tribunal or the respondent any notice that they would not be attending or any reason for their absence. The judgment records that the claim was presented on 17 February 2024 and that the claims were described as unclear.
The tribunal noted that the matter had previously been listed for a case management hearing in August 2024, when the claimant and his representative also did not attend, but on that occasion they had written in advance, explained their inability to attend and sought a postponement, which was granted. The notice of the December hearing had been emailed to the parties on 20 August 2024, and the respondent had had no response from the claimant's representative since August 2024.
Having regard to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and the overriding objective, the tribunal decided it was consistent with that objective to dismiss the claim for non-attendance. The judgment therefore records a procedural dismissal only and does not determine the substance of any pleaded claim on its merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 for non-attendance. The judgment says the claims were unclear and does not identify the substantive causes of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47 Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.