Case 2401192/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Hartley v Future Cleaning Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401192/2020
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Hartley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Slater sat at Manchester on 17 September 2021. The claimant, Ms D Hartley, did not attend the hearing. The respondent, Future Cleaning Services Limited, was represented by Ms G Rezaie, counsel, and Mr M Hagemeyer, solicitor.
The tribunal struck out the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because of the claimant’s failure to attend the hearing. The judgment records that the final hearing listed for 10 January 2022 was cancelled. Written reasons were not provided in the decision because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was noted in the record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing. The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.