Case 2401238/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Aylett v The Guinness Partnership Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401238/2024
- Decision date
- 28 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Aylett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Aylett brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages arising from holiday pay. He was employed by The Guinness Partnership Limited as a multiskilled joiner from 20 June 2011, worked fixed hours five days a week, and also received contractual overtime. The parties agreed that contractual overtime should be included in holiday pay, but disagreed about the backstop period, the calculation method, the days of leave to which the entitlement attached, and any offset.
The tribunal held that the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 limited the claim to the two years before presentation, so the relevant period was January 2022 to January 2024 rather than the 11 years claimed. It accepted the respondent's method of calculating a week's pay by reference to the agreed annual overtime figure of £9,384.84, producing a weekly rate of £179.99 and a daily rate of £36. The tribunal also held that the contractual overtime element attached only to the 20 days of regulation 13 leave, not the full 29 days' annual leave.
On that basis the tribunal found a shortfall in holiday pay properly payable. It accepted the respondent's right to offset £1,439.97 already paid, leaving £104.48 payable to the claimant. The tribunal made no award for financial loss because none had been claimed or proved, and made no award of interest because it held that it had no statutory jurisdiction to award interest on an unauthorised deduction from wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a minor internal discrepancy: paragraph 1 states the contractual overtime element of holiday pay properly due was £1,544.45, while paragraph 15 refers to £1,544.48. The operative award and the final sum payable were £104.48 after offset, so that figure is used here. | Upheld | — | £104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £104
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24 ERA 1996
- s.221 ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A and 16
- Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014
- Agnew
- Bear Scotland
- Lock
- Flowers
- Williams
- Bamsey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.