Case 2401369/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Morson v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401369/2022
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms H Morson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 June 2024, the tribunal gave Ms H Morson an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that no representations were made, or that any representations made were not sufficient, and no hearing was requested.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The reasons do not address the merits of any underlying complaint, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit; this claim type is assigned from the case listing category 'Part Time Workers and Working Time Regulations' rather than separately identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit; this claim type is assigned from the case listing category 'Part Time Workers and Working Time Regulations' rather than separately identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.