Case 2401578/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Treble v The Royal Bank Of Scotland Group plc and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401578/2022
- Decision date
- 6 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs W Treble
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment recorded preliminary decisions on time limits and jurisdiction in disability discrimination claims. The claimant's claims under s15 Equality Act 2010 and s20/21 Equality Act 2010 relating to the 14 April 2021 decision requiring her to relinquish her bank manager role were not submitted within three months of the alleged act.
The tribunal found that those claims were submitted within a further period that was just and equitable under s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010, so it had jurisdiction to consider them. The tribunal also recorded further reasonable adjustment claims under s20 and s21 that were out of time, but left the jurisdiction issue for those claims to be determined at the final hearing.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment, and no written reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally unless requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment determined a preliminary time-limit/jurisdiction issue, not the merits. The tribunal found it just and equitable under s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 to consider the s15 claim concerning the 14 April 2021 decision requiring the claimant to relinquish her bank manager role. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment determined a preliminary time-limit/jurisdiction issue, not the merits. The tribunal found it just and equitable under s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 to consider the s20/21 reasonable adjustment claim about a practice requiring a role to be relinquished before entitlement to disability insurance benefits. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Further reasonable adjustment claims under s20 and s21 Equality Act 2010 were identified as out of time, but the tribunal stated that jurisdiction to consider those claims would be determined at the final hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- s15 Equality Act 2010
- s20 and s21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.