Case 2401600/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Brockley v Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401600/2019
- Decision date
- 30 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Ms F Crane, Mr P Northam
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Brockley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Liverpool before Employment Judge Robinson with Ms F Crane and Mr P C Northam as lay members, heard the case on 2, 3 and 4 December 2019. The claimant, Miss R Brockley, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's Equality Act 2010 claims relating to discrimination arising from disability and an alleged breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments failed. Both claims were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Equality Act 2010 claim alleging discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Equality Act 2010 claim alleging a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.