Case 2401615/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Boros v AAH Pharmaceuticals Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401615/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Boros
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a reserved judgment from a preliminary hearing rather than a final liability decision. Employment Judge McDonald sat alone at Manchester (by CVP) on 6 January 2023, with deliberations in chambers on 16 February 2023. The judge formally dismissed on withdrawal the claimant's claims of breach of contract and race-related harassment, the claimant having previously confirmed at a case management hearing on 27 July 2022 that he was not pursuing them.
The judge granted the claimant's application to amend his claim to add three allegations of victimisation under s.27 of the Equality Act 2010 (V1-V3), so the live claim comprises eight allegations of direct race discrimination (RD1-RD8) and the three victimisation allegations. The judge then refused the respondent's application to strike out those claims or to make them subject to a deposit order. The judge held that, taking the claimant's case at its highest and given the absence of undisputed contemporaneous documentation conclusively disproving his account, it could not be said that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success.
The underlying dispute concerns the claimant's hourly pay rate following an August 2021 pay announcement, the treatment of a "trial rate" of £11.75 per hour versus a basic rate of £9.17 plus an FLT allowance, the handling of his grievance, and subsequent events including a deduction from pay in October 2022. The judge emphasised that refusing strike-out does not mean the claimant will succeed at the final hearing; whether there was less favourable treatment because of race, and whether the matters complained of amount to victimisation, are matters for the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on withdrawal. The claimant had confirmed at the earlier case management hearing on 27 July 2022 that he was not pursuing this claim; the judge formally recorded its dismissal on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | Race-related harassment claim dismissed on withdrawal. Claimant had confirmed at the 27 July 2022 case management hearing that he was not pursuing this claim. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim (allegations RD1-RD8). This is a preliminary hearing judgment only: the respondent's application to strike out the claim (or alternatively impose a deposit order) was refused, so the claim proceeds to a final hearing. No substantive outcome on liability has been determined. | Other | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010 (allegations V1-V3) added by amendment, which the judge granted. The respondent's strike-out/deposit application was refused. No substantive outcome on liability; claim proceeds to final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.