Case 2401657/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E McGee v Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401657/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E McGee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 2 July 2020 before Employment Judge McDonald, the tribunal dealt only with the claimant's holiday pay complaint and her complaint for arrears of pay unlawfully deducted by the respondent. Both were recorded as dismissed on withdrawal, so there was no merits finding on those complaints.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining complaints were unaffected by this decision and would proceed to the final hearing. No remedy was assessed in this judgment and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint that the respondent failed to pay holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint for arrears of pay unlawfully deducted by the respondent was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.