Case 2401776/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Whelan v Sellafield Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401776/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Whelan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Carlisle before Employment Judge Holmes, with Mr P Whelan appearing in person and Sellafield Limited represented by Miss N Choudhry, solicitor. The tribunal held that the claimant's claims were presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented within time. On that basis the tribunal could not extend time for presentation and the claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because the tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within time, so time could not be extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because the tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within time, so time could not be extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.