Case 2401778/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Dundure v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401778/2019
- Decision date
- 7 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Dundure
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal heard from the claimant and from counsel for the respondent. The claimant's complaint of harassment was struck out because it had been presented out of time, and the Tribunal found that it would not be just and equitable to extend time.
The Tribunal also struck out the claimant's complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages relating to holiday pay, company shares, and an alleged failure to pay Income Benefit Protection. The claimant's remaining complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was not finally determined and was directed to proceed to a future hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment states the harassment complaint was struck out as presented out of time and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. The protected characteristic for the harassment complaint is not specified in the written judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment identifies an unauthorised deductions from wages complaint in respect of holiday pay and states it was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of company shares and an alleged failure to pay Income Benefit Protection were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The remaining complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was allowed to proceed to a later hearing; no final adjudicated outcome is given in this preliminary judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.