Case 2401838/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Respondent v Heard at — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401838/2025
- Decision date
- 11 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Respondent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants, Mr B Kedward and Mr J Wilkinson, brought claims against D&H Equipment. The judgment identifies the claims as holiday pay and redundancy pay claims.
Neither the claimants nor the respondent attended the hearing on 26 September 2025. Employment Judge KM Ross struck out the holiday pay and redundancy pay claims under Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 because the claimants did not attend the hearing; the extracted text appears to be truncated at the end of the stated reason.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimants' claims for holiday pay were struck out under Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) because the claimants did not attend the hearing. The extracted PDF text appears truncated at the end of the reason. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimants' claims for redundancy pay were struck out under Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) because the claimants did not attend the hearing. The extracted PDF text appears truncated at the end of the reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.