Case 2401953/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Wilson v Viaduct Care CIC — 2026
- Case reference
- 2401953/2024
- Decision date
- 18 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
- Panel members
- Ms F Crane, Ms A Berkeley-Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 19-23, 26 and 27 January 2026 before Regional Employment Judge Franey, with Ms F Crane and Ms A Berkeley-Hill sitting as members. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual process.
The tribunal recorded that complaints numbered 2.1.13, 3.2.1, 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. It then dismissed all remaining complaints of harassment related to religious belief under section 26 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal also dismissed all remaining complaints of harassment related to race or nationality under section 26 Equality Act 2010, and all remaining complaints of direct discrimination because of religious belief under section 13 Equality Act 2010. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaints numbered 2.1.13, 3.2.1, 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | All remaining complaints of harassment related to religious belief contrary to section 26 Equality Act 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | All remaining complaints of harassment related to race or nationality contrary to section 26 Equality Act 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | All remaining complaints of direct discrimination because of religious belief contrary to section 13 Equality Act 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.