Case 2402099/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Li v 15405172 Limited (previously Gonbayy Limited) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402099/2024
- Decision date
- 29 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Li
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the respondent's name to 15405172 Limited and found that the claimant was a disabled person by reason of ADHD and Autism at the relevant time.
The Tribunal found that the complaints of direct disability discrimination in respect of dismissal, direct age discrimination, and harassment related to age were well founded and succeeded. It dismissed the complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment related to disability. The respondent was ordered to pay £6,500 as compensation for injury to feelings, including interest calculated under the Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct disability discrimination in respect of the claimant's dismissal was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct age discrimination was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint of harassment related to age was well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint of harassment related to disability was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.