Case 2402162/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Nelson First v 883 Retail Limited Second Respondent: DSBM Retail Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402162/2024
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Nelson First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims against the first respondent were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not identify separate causes of action for those withdrawn claims.
The tribunal dismissed the automatic dismissal claim based on public interest disclosure, the wrongful dismissal claim, the holiday pay claim, and the harassment related to sexual orientation claim. The judgment states that no claims succeeded and that the claim in its entirety was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Judgment describes this as automatic dismissal for the reason or principal reason of having made a public interest disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Judgment describes this as harassment related to sexual orientation. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Other | Claims against the first respondent were dismissed on withdrawal; the judgment does not identify separate claim types for the withdrawn claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.