Case 2402175/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Rae v Compsych Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402175/2020
- Decision date
- 18 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hill REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Rae
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Rae was employed by Compsych Limited from 21 January 2019 to an effective date of termination of 31 October 2019. The tribunal held that her disability discrimination claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment were out of time, and therefore dismissed them for want of jurisdiction.
The tribunal found that the claim of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, based on protected disclosure, was well founded and succeeded. It also found that the claim that she was subjected to a detriment because she had made a protected disclosure under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded.
Compensation was assessed at £25,323.17. The tribunal recorded a basic award of £0.00 because the claimant did not have sufficient service to qualify. It awarded £9,197.11 for loss to the date of hearing after deductions for self-employment support and earnings, £12,126.06 for future loss of earnings, and £4,000 for compensation for detriment/injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments; dismissed because it was out of time and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability harassment claim; dismissed because it was out of time and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996, said to arise from a protected disclosure. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment claim under section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996 for having made a protected disclosure. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,323
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £21,323
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.