Case 2402195/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Fogg v Complete Review Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402195/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms V Worthington, Mr G Pennie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Fogg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat in Manchester on 22 and 23 September 2024 before Employment Judge K M Ross, Ms V Worthington and Mr G Pennie. It unanimously held that two section 15 Equality Act 2010 claims were well-founded: the claimant was dismissed because of something arising in consequence of disability, and he was also subjected to threats of violence, poked in the chest, ordered to leave the premises immediately, and told to resign because of something arising in consequence of disability.
The Tribunal rejected two other section 15 claims. Although it accepted that the claimant was demoted, replaced in his role, and due to have his pay decreased, it found those matters were not because of something arising in consequence of disability. It also rejected the claim that the respondent ordered the claimant to move his car and stop using a parking space because of something arising in consequence of disability.
The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim, based on a contention that he was entitled to four weeks' notice rather than one week, also failed. The written judgment records that the case would proceed to remedy on 24 September 2024, so this liability decision does not contain a monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found this section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim well-founded and listed the case for a separate remedy hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found the claimant was subjected to threats of violence, was poked in the chest, was ordered to leave the premises immediately, and was told to resign; this section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal accepted that the claimant was demoted, replaced in his role, and due to have his pay decreased, but found these matters were not because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim that the respondent ordered the claimant to move his car and stop using a parking space because of something arising in consequence of disability failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deductions from wages, said to arise from a four-week rather than one-week notice period, was not well-founded. | Dismissed |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.