Case 2402301/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Begum (1) Mrs F Yasmeen (2) v Lancashire County Council and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402301/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson MEMBERS
- Panel members
- Ms H Sheard, Mr A Egerton
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs S Begum (1) Mrs F Yasmeen (2)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment in relation to both claimants, Mrs S Begum and Mrs F Yasmeen, against Lancashire County Council, Marian Taylor and Ian Watson.
It found that the complaints of direct discrimination relating to race and to religion or belief were not well founded and were not successful. It also found that the complaints of harassment connected with race and with religion or belief were not well founded and were not successful.
The Tribunal further found that the complaint of victimisation was not well founded and was not successful. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of direct discrimination relating to race under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and not successful. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of direct discrimination relating to religion or belief under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and not successful. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records that the complaint of harassment connected with race under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and not successful. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records that the complaint of harassment connected with religion or belief under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and not successful. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the complaint of victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and not successful. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.