Case 2402337/2021 · Employment Tribunal
U Chothia v E.ON Energy Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402337/2021
- Decision date
- 28 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
U Chothia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued case management orders on 8 July 2021, sent to the parties on 28 July 2021, giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had failed to attend the case management preliminary hearing, had not engaged with the respondent to prepare for that hearing, had failed to comply with orders to provide further particulars of his discrimination complaint, and had not actively pursued the claim.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Batten struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant failed to attend the case management preliminary hearing, failed to engage with the respondent to prepare for the hearing, failed to comply with orders to provide further particulars of his discrimination complaint, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.